Republican incumbent Saxby Chambliss has won the Georgia Senate run-off:
With 96 percent of the state’s precincts reporting in the runoff election, Mr. Chambliss had 57.5 percent of the vote, and his Democratic challenger, Jim Martin, 42.5 percent. The margin was far greater than the three percentage points that separated the two men in the Nov. 4 election, when neither won the required 50 percent. Many of the Democrats who turned out last month in enthusiastic support of Barack Obama apparently did not show up at the polls on Tuesday.This obviously begs the question: why didn't the President -- excuse me, President-Elect -- campaign for Jim Martin in the past few weeks? What the exit polls are hinting at is exactly what the above NYT article states: Obama Dems simply didn't vote. Chambliss' victory is in no way surprising, but would Obama made a significant difference for Martin? I think absolutely. If Obama spoke for the Democratic challenger at even a handful of events, the Obama base would have rallied to his support. A vote for Martin would have been a vote for Obama, because without him, who is Jim Martin? Answer: Jim Martin. Exactly.
Thus, without a Democratic Senator from Georgia, the Blues cannot reach the targeted 60-seat filibuster-less Senate. Perhaps more importantly, this makes Al Franken's campaign almost meaningless to the Dems, who really don't need him in Congress (in two ways really: first, the magic 60 can't be reached; second: we won't have any Daily Affirmations from Stuart Smalley while a bailout bill is on the floor. Wait, that'd probably be awesome.)
Obama should've been there. Taking time out of his busy schedule wouldn't have killed his ability to formulate his National Security team. Hell, even W. made time to clear the brush while we were watching the Shock and Awe special on CNN.
-- A.S. Noel